<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Hammerstein journal</title>
  <subtitle>Writing on the Hammerstein framework, the benchmark, and what the AI is doing.</subtitle>
  <link href="https://hammerstein.ai/journal/atom.xml" rel="self"/>
  <link href="https://hammerstein.ai/journal/"/>
  <updated>2026-07-03T16:00:00Z</updated>
  <id>https://hammerstein.ai/journal/</id>
  <author>
    <name>Ray Weiss</name>
    <email>ray@hammerstein.ai</email>
    <uri>https://hammerstein.ai/</uri>
  </author>
  <rights>Copyright 2026 Ray Weiss / Conflict Simulations Limited</rights>

  <entry>
    <title>The dice are real.</title>
    <link href="https://hammerstein.ai/journal/the-dice-are-real/"/>
    <id>https://hammerstein.ai/journal/the-dice-are-real/</id>
    <updated>2026-07-03T16:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-07-03T16:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Every mode on hammerstein.ai now runs Sonnet 5, and a solo RPG GM mode opened at /rpg. Its dice are drawn from a tape fixed when the campaign starts, echoed in the mechanical log, and checked by the server before a turn stands. Cairn ships built in, alongside the GM&amp;rsquo;s own 2012 game.</summary>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <title>Three umpires shipped today.</title>
    <link href="https://hammerstein.ai/journal/three-umpires-shipped/"/>
    <id>https://hammerstein.ai/journal/three-umpires-shipped/</id>
    <updated>2026-05-21T16:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-21T16:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="html">A kriegsspiel umpire, a matrix-game referee, and a hosted chat. The kriegsspiel surface changed how I think about what the framework is doing &amp;mdash; Marshall Neal dogfooded the SCKA Advanced ruleset for a week and the engine surfaced two real gaps in his published rules along the way.</summary>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <title>We pulled Grok aside and asked what it really thought.</title>
    <link href="https://hammerstein.ai/journal/we-pulled-grok-aside/"/>
    <id>https://hammerstein.ai/journal/we-pulled-grok-aside/</id>
    <updated>2026-05-13T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-13T12:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="html">The same Grok 4.20 model that called our benchmark &amp;ldquo;solid work&amp;rdquo; on X, in a private API call, called it &amp;ldquo;a specialized idiot-savant for this exact distribution.&amp;rdquo; Then it designed the test that would prove it. We ran the test.</summary>
  </entry>

</feed>
